(Estimated reading time: just over 1 minute)
On Saturday we travelled across the new Queensferry Crossing.
It’s a lovely looking bridge (see Modern can be beautiful). And, it will last for more than 100 years.
Also, it’s claimed that it will be able to withstand winds and stay open in situations that would have closed the Forth Road Bridge.
So that all sounds good. Maybe even great.
The design of the roads to the bridge doesn’t seem to have been addressed. The queues that plagued the old bridge are impacting on the new one. Four lanes of traffic still reduce to two at the entrance to the bridge.
This seems like a lost opportunity. Shouldn’t an iconic project have created a better solution to multiple problems? Presumably, the project objective was achieved – build a more robust bridge.
But what limited the vision?I know that more work = more cost. But is that the real – or only – reason?
The Scottish Government has been criticised whenever the Forth Road Bridge was closed to traffic. Yet, complaints about regular, daily delays for drivers barely register at a national level. Is the problem the difference between FUBAR and SNAFU?
Lack of vision, economy, oversight or cynical approach? Whatever the reason, it’s not great, and it takes the shine off an impressive piece of infrastructure.